| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
41. Dominion Upkeep Problem Solved! - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Superfluous idea really. More activity = more people generating income = easier to pay upkeep already. Reducing it as well would be completely redundant. Yes, people have to work out a way of taxing income generated in their space but that aint...
- by Amy Wang - at 2009.11.07 12:05:00
|
42. [Proposal] Require 24 Hour Vote to Disband Alliance - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
signed make it even 72h tbh
- by Amy Wang - at 2009.11.06 21:35:00
|
43. CCP new secret project? - in Out of Pod Experience [original thread]
most MMOs these days are WOW clones, these guys make a (albeit really really obvious) Eve clone, good for them
- by Amy Wang - at 2009.10.29 22:32:00
|
44. Make disbanding an Alliance harder - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I've said it after the Bob disbanding and gonna say it again after CVA now: It is beyond silly that locking down a t1 BPO or declaring an empire war requires a vote and has a waiting period while something as impacting as disbanding an alliance ...
- by Amy Wang - at 2009.10.28 22:26:00
|
45. Changes to T2 BPs - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Gordon Red Doesn't CCP said on the Fanfest, that they will also alter the build time of the "lower valued" ship components to compensate the increased amounts? indeed they did, so chillax
- by Amy Wang - at 2009.10.28 12:04:00
|
46. [Proposal] Prolong Dominion sov lock till after New Year - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Rudolf Miller I disagree. Make sov drop instantly.. let chaos rule!! no problem with that either as that would be start of December but putting the hotspot on the holidays is pretty silly imho
- by Amy Wang - at 2009.10.26 16:50:00
|
47. [Proposal] Prolong Dominion sov lock till after New Year - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
So current Domination timeframe looks like this if I'm not mistaken: Start of December expansion and new sov system is introduced but sov is locked for 3 more weeks in the state it was right before Dominion got deployed. This puts the end of the...
- by Amy Wang - at 2009.10.26 14:27:00
|
48. Dominion Supercarrier Feedback - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Muadeeb Ousil On the other hand if you want more people to fly them, this is the key barrior that excludes them from doing so. There are many pilots with the isk/training line that would aspire to flying one, however they a...
- by Amy Wang - at 2009.10.26 14:04:00
|
49. Dominion Supercarrier Feedback - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Hull Blaster Fair enough on the fact that super carriers shouldn't dock if thats what you guys want. But I think its mad that you should effectively loose a character just to pilot one. If they want to make super capitals a ...
- by Amy Wang - at 2009.10.22 11:04:00
|
50. Dominion Supercarrier Feedback - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Amy Wang on 19/10/2009 10:10:53 Originally by: McFly Wyvern, for the first time I tried to be serious business with this ship, but again I realized that it was pointless. Shield tank with 2 X-type Pith boost amps, DG Invuln...
- by Amy Wang - at 2009.10.19 10:10:00
|
51. Capital Weapons Feedback - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Amy Wang on 19/10/2009 09:54:17 The short-range damage and range figures need some overworking, nothing against increasing the short-range weapons effective range but making them all almost equal range wise while introducing massive...
- by Amy Wang - at 2009.10.19 09:47:00
|
52. Dumbing down eve yet again. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Kuzya Morozov This thread is full of delicious tears. When you needed to train for it, you cried about how high the skill requirements were. Now that you've got it trained, you don't want anyone else having it easier than y...
- by Amy Wang - at 2009.10.19 09:36:00
|
53. CCP Please Give Titans a role! - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Awesome gang bonuses and the jump bridge not enough role for you?
- by Amy Wang - at 2009.10.18 16:53:00
|
54. Dumbing down eve yet again. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
yes, it is "dumbing down" the game somewhat skills that required some lvl 5 skills before were a decision to train or not to train and focus elsewhere, with lvl 4 as requirement that choice becomes essentially a no-brainer, thus it is dumbing dow...
- by Amy Wang - at 2009.10.18 16:46:00
|
55. Fighter bombers need Fighters to V - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Franconis I am of the opinion though that you shouldn't be in a supercarrier if you don't have carrier V and Fighters V anyway, so I don't really see a problem with the skill requirement. ^^ this the only reason to be ...
- by Amy Wang - at 2009.10.18 07:43:00
|
56. Capital Weapons Feedback - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Theron Gyrow Future Phoenix DPS with kinetic torps, 3*dam mod: 6528 Future Phoenix max range with torps: 59km (~55km in reality) Future Naglfar DPS with ACs w/EMP, torps, 3*gyro: 6884 (includes EMP change) Future Naglfar r...
- by Amy Wang - at 2009.10.17 14:04:00
|
57. Dominion Titan Feedback - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Zeveron So just leave the overheat and boosters (which both sides have) out of discussion. no, both sides do not have overheatable omni hardeners with 37.5% effect (faction, cheap) or up to 50% effect (officer), just ...
- by Amy Wang - at 2009.10.14 15:22:00
|
58. Dominion Titan Feedback - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Zeveron I didnt left anything out. yes, you did here (bolded it) Originally by: Zeveron My point is that the armor tankers get arround 20% more hps for free, w/o using any mods . Add to that the hp boost and ...
- by Amy Wang - at 2009.10.14 10:27:00
|
59. Dominion Titan Feedback - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Zeveron My point is that the armor tankers get arround 20% more hps for free, w/o using any mods. Add to that the hp boost and you see the problem. What is the point of leaving out mods (where the shield tankers shine) ...
- by Amy Wang - at 2009.10.14 07:40:00
|
60. Where's the thread about Thermodynamics requiring Energy Management 4? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
keep the prerequisite at energy management 5, this is not a basic function it is a specialized function and as such should require some sort of dedicated training, stop dumbing down the game please same goes for the exploration realated skill pre...
- by Amy Wang - at 2009.10.08 14:42:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |